<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.rosa.ru/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.rosa.ru/"
          
          maintainer="d.postnikov@rosa.ru"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1033</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-10-30 14:50:32 +0400</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Strange output of df</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2026-04-17 21:12:15 +0300</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>2</classification_id>
          <classification>ROSA-based products</classification>
          <product>ROSA Fresh</product>
          <component>Packages from Main</component>
          <version>Marathon</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>374</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Normal</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="ROSA Linux Bugs">bugs</assigned_to>
          <cc>alexander.barakin</cc>
    
    <cc>alexander.kazantsev</cc>
    
    <cc>alexander.petryakov</cc>
          
          <cf_platform>---</cf_platform>
          <cf_security_code></cf_security_code>
          <cf_package></cf_package>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4726</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
      <attachid>800</attachid>
    <who name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-30 14:50:32 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 800
Diagnostic information

Description of problem:
I have such disk configuration:
# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160040803840 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders, всего 312579695 секторов
Units = секторы of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x8a0a3a6c

Устр-во Загр     Начало       Конец       Блоки   Id  Система
/dev/sda1   *        2048    25189919    12593936   83  Linux
/dev/sda2        25192440   312576704   143692132+   5  Расширенный
/dev/sda5        25192448    33367004     4087278+  82  Linux своп / Solaris
/dev/sda6        33370112   312576704   139603296+  83  Linux

If I run df command I get strange strings in the top:
# df
df: «/sys/fs/fuse/connections»: Нет такого файла или каталога
df: «/sys/fs/fuse/connections»: Нет такого файла или каталога
df: «/sys/fs/fuse/connections»: Нет такого файла или каталога
Файловая система Размер Использовано  Дост Использовано% Cмонтировано в
/dev/sda1           12G         4,9G  6,4G           44% /
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home
/dev/sda6          132G         958M  131G            1% /home

I have attached some diagnostic information


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4727</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Aleksandr Kazantcev">alexander.kazantsev</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-30 14:52:59 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>rm -rf /etc/mtab
ln -s /proc/self/mounts /etc/mtab

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 374 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4743</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 12:39:16 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>User has told that problem is not solved and he has such output if df command after applying recomendation

# df
Файловая система Размер Использовано  Дост Использовано% Cмонтировано в
rootfs              12G         4,9G  6,4G           44% /
devtmpfs           3,9G            0  3,9G            0% /dev
tmpfs              3,9G            0  3,9G            0% /dev/shm
tmpfs              3,9G         3,1M  3,9G            1% /run
/dev/sda1           12G         4,9G  6,4G           44% /
tmpfs              3,9G         3,1M  3,9G            1% /run
tmpfs              3,9G            0  3,9G            0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs              3,9G            0  3,9G            0% /media
/dev/sda6          132G         990M  131G            1% /home</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4744</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Aleksandr Kazantcev">alexander.kazantsev</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 12:48:03 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Last output is normal - what&apos;s wrong for user?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4745</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 12:58:54 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; Last output is normal - what&apos;s wrong for user?

many tmpfs items are correct?
And duplicate like this
tmpfs              3,9G         3,1M  3,9G            1% /run</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4746</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Aleksandr Kazantcev">alexander.kazantsev</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 13:03:23 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yes, for version programm in Marathon is correct.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4747</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 13:08:07 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; Yes, for version programm in Marathon is correct.

I can&apos;t understand Your answer? The output maybe correct or incorrect at all.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4748</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Aleksandr Kazantcev">alexander.kazantsev</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 13:09:27 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yes, it&apos;s correct. tmpfs is a part of local fs.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4759</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-31 16:00:48 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)
&gt; Yes, it&apos;s correct. tmpfs is a part of local fs.

An answer of user on the question &quot;What is strange&quot;?
1. &quot;tmpfs 3,9G 3,1M 3,9G 1% /run&quot; - are duplicated
2. He expected for 
Файловая система Размер Использовано Дост Использовано% Cмонтировано в
/dev/sda1 12G 4,9G 6,4G 44% /
/dev/sda6 132G 990M 131G 1% /home</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5728</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="alexander barakin">alexander.barakin</who>
    <bug_when>2012-12-18 20:20:08 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; 2. He expected for 

$ df -t ext4</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>5729</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="alexander barakin">alexander.barakin</who>
    <bug_when>2012-12-18 20:20:40 +0400</bug_when>
    <thetext>

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 374 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>87505</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry Postnikov">pastordidi</who>
    <bug_when>2026-04-17 21:12:15 +0300</bug_when>
    <thetext>The content of attachment 800 has been deleted</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>800</attachid>
            <date>2012-10-30 14:50:32 +0400</date>
            <delta_ts>2012-10-30 14:50:32 +0400</delta_ts>
            <desc>Diagnostic information</desc>
            <filename>diag.txt</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>0</size>
            <attacher name="FirstLevel">firstlevel</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64"></data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>